Not1b4me’s Blog

WeRtheVoices

GE CEO JEFFREY IMMELT, THE HEAD OF OBAMA’S JOBS COUNCIL, IS MOVING THOUSANDS OF JOBS TO CHINA At A BLISTERING PACE

GE CEO JEFFREY IMMELT, THE HEAD OF OBAMA’S JOBS COUNCIL, IS MOVING THOUSANDS OF JOBS TO CHINA At A BLISTERING PACE.

Advertisements

January 4, 2012 Posted by | DumbAss Democrats, Obama Crap | Leave a comment

Outrage! Author of ‘stimulus’ tied to companies funded by bill: Received hundreds of millions in government grants, loans. « Klein Online

Outrage! Author of ‘stimulus’ tied to companies funded by bill: Received hundreds of millions in government grants, loans. « Klein Online.

 

Outrage! Author of ‘stimulus’ tied to companies funded by bill: Received hundreds of millions in government grants, loans.

image

By Aaron Klein

An advisor to President Obama who played a key role in developing the energy provisions of the so-called stimulus bill has graced the board of several companies that recently received government funds, including hundreds of million in “stimulus” money.

TJ Glauthier served on Obama’s 2008 White House Transition Team. He is widely credited with helping to craft the energy provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as the “stimulus.”

In addition to serving on the boards of multiple major energy companies, Glauthier previously held two Presidential appointments during the Clinton Administration.

He was the Energy Department’s Deputy Secretary and Chief Operating Officer, the second-highest ranking official.

Earlier, he served in the White House for five years as the Associate Director for Natural Resources, Energy and Science in the Office of Management and Budget.

Glauthier is tied to several energy companies that benefited from the “stimulus” bill he helped to craft.

One such company investigated by KleinOnline is GridPoint Inc, where he was appointed to the board in March 2008.  GridPoint provides utilities software solutions for electrical grid management and electric power demand and supply balancing.

The “stimulus” provides for $4.5 billion for so-called smart grid projects. GridPoint has benefited from scores of smart grid deals funded by the “stimulus” bill.

The company partnered with the Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation (eTec), Nissan, the Idaho National Laboratory and others in a project to deploy electric vehicles (EVs) and their charging infrastructure in five states.  The Energy Department had awarded eTec almost $100 million in “stimulus” funds to support the project.

GridPoint’s role in the eTec project was to supply smart charging and data logging capability to utilities located in strategic markets of eTec’s program in Arizona, California, Oregon, Tennessee and Washington.

GridPoint also benefited from “stimulus” funds when it recently provided home energy management, load management and electric vehicle management software solutions for a KCP&L’s Green Impact Zone SmartGrid Demonstration in Kansas City, Mo. The project was the recipient of stimulus funding.

Additionally, GridPoint helped the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, or SMUD, to manage power from its customers’ rooftop solar panels.

The Arlington, Va.-based company had landed a contract to help the Sacramento, Calif.-based municipal utility manage renewable power integration, energy storage and home energy management systems. SMUD had won $127.5 million in stimulus funds from the Department of Energy to carry out the project, which also includes deploying 600,000 smart meters in its service territory.

Also, in early 2009, the Energy Department awarded Argonne National Laboratory nearly $2.7 million in stimulus funding for three solar-energy related research projects. In addition, Argonne reportedly shared another $5 million in stimulus funding for projects with GridPoint and other companies and the University of Illinois Sustainable Technology Center.

Besides benefiting from stimulus grants, GridPoint last year won a $28 million contract with the United States Postal Service to install energy management systems in selected post office locations across the U.S.

Glauthier, meanwhile, had come under fire in the conservative blogosphere after Fox News reported the U.S. Navy has purchased 450,000 gallons of biofuel for about $16 a gallon, or about 4 times the price of its standard marine fuel, JP-5, which has been going for under $4 a gallon.

HotAir reported last week that Glauthier is a “strategic advisor” to Solazyme, the California company that is selling a portion of the biofuel to the Navy.

HotAir noted Solazyme received a $21.8 million grant from the 2009 stimulus package.

Also, writing at BigGovernment two weeks ago, Whitney Pitcher found that prior to serving as advisor to Solazyme and after his time as part of Obama’s transition team, Glauthier served of the advisory board of SunRun, a solar financing company.

In October of 2010, just a few short months after Glauthier joined SunRun’s advisory board, SunRun secured a $6.73 million grant from this Treasury Department stimulus program. The company was the ninth largest recipient of such programs through the December, 2010.

With research by Brenda J. Elliott

December 20, 2011 Posted by | Obama Crap, Socialist | Leave a comment

50 Facts About The U.S. Economy That Will Shock You TheBlaze.com

50 Facts About The U.S. Economy That Will Shock You TheBlaze.com.

50 Economic Numbers From 2011 That Are Almost Too Crazy To Believe

Even though most Americans have become very frustrated with this economy, the reality is that the vast majority of them still have no idea just how bad our economic decline has been or how much trouble we are going to be in if we don’t make dramatic changes immediately.  If we do not educate the American people about how deathly ill the U.S. economy has become, then they will just keep falling for the same old lies that our politicians keep telling them.  Just “tweaking” things here and there is not going to fix this economy.  We truly do need a fundamental change in direction.  America is consuming far more wealth than it is producing and our debt is absolutely exploding.  If we stay on this current path, an economic collapse is inevitable.  Hopefully the crazy economic numbers from 2011 that I have included in this article will be shocking enough to wake some people up.

At this time of the year, a lot of families get together, and in most homes the conversation usually gets around to politics at some point.  Hopefully many of you will use the list below as a tool to help you share the reality of the U.S. economic crisis with your family and friends.  If we all work together, hopefully we can get millions of people to wake up and realize that “business as usual” will result in a national economic apocalypse.

The following are 50 economic numbers from 2011 that are almost too crazy to believe….

#1 A staggering 48 percent of all Americans are either considered to be “low income” or are living in poverty.

#2 Approximately 57 percent of all children in the United States are living in homes that are either considered to be “low income” or impoverished.

#3 If the number of Americans that “wanted jobs” was the same today as it was back in 2007, the “official” unemployment rate put out by the U.S. government would be up to 11 percent.

#4 The average amount of time that a worker stays unemployed in the United States is now over 40 weeks.

#5 One recent survey found that 77 percent of all U.S. small businesses do not plan to hire any more workers.

#6 There are fewer payroll jobs in the United States today than there were back in 2000 even though we have added 30 million extra people to the population since then.

#7 Since December 2007, median household income in the United States has declined by a total of 6.8% once you account for inflation.

#8 According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 16.6 million Americans were self-employed back in December 2006.  Today, that number has shrunk to 14.5 million.

#9 A Gallup poll from earlier this year found that approximately one out of every five Americans that do have a job consider themselves to be underemployed.

#10 According to author Paul Osterman, about 20 percent of all U.S. adults are currently working jobs that pay poverty-level wages.

#11 Back in 1980, less than 30% of all jobs in the United States were low income jobs.  Today, more than 40% of all jobs in the United States are low income jobs.

#12 Back in 1969, 95 percent of all men between the ages of 25 and 54 had a job.  In July, only 81.2 percent of men in that age group had a job.

#13 One recent survey found that one out of every three Americans would not be able to make a mortgage or rent payment next month if they suddenly lost their current job.

#14 The Federal Reserve recently announced that the total net worth of U.S. households declined by 4.1 percent in the 3rd quarter of 2011 alone.

#15 According to a recent study conducted by the BlackRock Investment Institute, the ratio of household debt to personal income in the United States is now 154 percent.

#16 As the economy has slowed down, so has the number of marriages.  According to a Pew Research Center analysis, only 51 percent of all Americans that are at least 18 years old are currently married.  Back in 1960, 72 percentof all U.S. adults were married.

#17 The U.S. Postal Service has lost more than 5 billion dollars over the past year.

#18 In Stockton, California home prices have declined 64 percent from where they were at when the housing market peaked.

#19 Nevada has had the highest foreclosure rate in the nation for 59 monthsin a row.

#20 If you can believe it, the median price of a home in Detroit is now just $6000.

#21 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 18 percent of all homes in the state of Florida are sitting vacant.  That figure is 63 percent larger than it was just ten years ago.

#22 New home construction in the United States is on pace to set a brand new all-time record low in 2011.

#23 As I have written about previously, 19 percent of all American men between the ages of 25 and 34 are now living with their parents.

#24 Electricity bills in the United States have risen faster than the overall rate of inflation for five years in a row.

#25 According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, health care costs accounted for just 9.5% of all personal consumption back in 1980.  Today they account for approximately 16.3%.

#26 One study found that approximately 41 percent of all working age Americans either have medical bill problems or are currently paying off medical debt.

#27 If you can believe it, one out of every seven Americans has at least 10 credit cards.

#28 The United States spends about 4 dollars on goods and services from China for every one dollar that China spends on goods and services from the United States.

#29 It is being projected that the U.S. trade deficit for 2011 will be 558.2 billion dollars.

#30 The retirement crisis in the United States just continues to get worse.  According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, 46 percent of all American workers have less than $10,000 saved for retirement, and 29 percent of all American workers have less than $1,000 saved for retirement.

#31 Today, one out of every six elderly Americans lives below the federal poverty line.

#32 According to a study that was just released, CEO pay at America’s biggest companies rose by 36.5% in just one recent 12 month period.

#33 Today, the “too big to fail” banks are larger than ever.  The total assets of the six largest U.S. banks increased by 39 percent between September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2011.

#34 The six heirs of Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton have a net worth that is roughly equal to the bottom 30 percent of all Americans combined.

#35 According to an analysis of Census Bureau data done by the Pew Research Center, the median net worth for households led by someone 65 years of age or older is 47 times greater than the median net worth for households led by someone under the age of 35.

#36 If you can believe it, 37 percent of all U.S. households that are led by someone under the age of 35 have a net worth of zero or less than zero.

#37 A higher percentage of Americans is living in extreme poverty (6.7%) than has ever been measured before.

#38 Child homelessness in the United States is now 33 percent higher than it was back in 2007.

#39 Since 2007, the number of children living in poverty in the state of California has increased by 30 percent.

#40 Sadly, child poverty is absolutely exploding all over America.  According to the National Center for Children in Poverty, 36.4% of all children that live in Philadelphia are living in poverty, 40.1% of all children that live in Atlanta are living in poverty, 52.6% of all children that live in Cleveland are living in poverty and 53.6% of all children that live in Detroit are living in poverty.

#41 Today, one out of every seven Americans is on food stamps and one out of every four American children is on food stamps.

#42 In 1980, government transfer payments accounted for just 11.7% of all income.  Today, government transfer payments account for more than 18 percent of all income.

#43 A staggering 48.5% of all Americans live in a household that receives some form of government benefits.  Back in 1983, that number was below 30 percent.

#44 Right now, spending by the federal government accounts for about 24 percent of GDP.  Back in 2001, it accounted for just 18 percent.

#45 For fiscal year 2011, the U.S. federal government had a budget deficit ofnearly 1.3 trillion dollars.  That was the third year in a row that our budget deficit has topped one trillion dollars.

#46 If Bill Gates gave every single penny of his fortune to the U.S. government, it would only cover the U.S. budget deficit for about 15 days.

#47 Amazingly, the U.S. government has now accumulated a total debt of 15 trillion dollars.  When Barack Obama first took office the national debt was just 10.6 trillion dollars.

#48 If the federal government began right at this moment to repay the U.S. national debt at a rate of one dollar per second, it would take over 440,000 years to pay off the national debt.

#49 The U.S. national debt has been increasing by an average of more than 4 billion dollars per day since the beginning of the Obama administration.

#50 During the Obama administration, the U.S. government has accumulated more debt than it did from the time that George Washington took office to the time that Bill Clinton took office.

Of course the heart of our economic problems is the Federal Reserve.  The Federal Reserve is a perpetual debt machine, it has almost completely destroyed the value of the U.S. dollar and it has an absolutely nightmarish track record of incompetence.  If the Federal Reserve system had never been created, the U.S. economy would be in far better shape.  The federal government needs to shut down the Federal Reserve and start issuing currency that is not debt-based.  That would be a very significant step toward restoring prosperity to America.

During 2011 we made a lot of progress in educating the American people about our economic problems, but we still have a long way to go.

Hopefully next year more Americans than ever will wake up, because 2012 is going to represent a huge turning point for this country.

December 19, 2011 Posted by | Obama Crap | Leave a comment

Obama’s $535 Mil Green Energy Co. Folds

Obama’s $535 Mil Green Energy Co. Folds

September 01, 2011

Liberty Alerts, Corruption Chronicles

A fly by night solar panel company that got more than half a billion dollars from the U.S. government to promote green energy has abruptly folded, stiffing American taxpayers while laying off more than 1,000 workers.

Shortly after cutting a fat check President Obama touted the northern California firm, Solyndra, as a prominent example of clean energy. “Companies like Solyndra are leading the way toward a brighter and more prosperous future,” the president said during a visit to the now-defunct company’s Fremont headquarters.

The investment in Solyndra had been hyped up by the administration as part of the president’s “aggressive strategy to put Americans back to work” and reduce the country’s “dependence on foreign oil by developing clean, renewable sources of energy.” At least that’s what Obama’s Energy Secretary, Steven Chu, said shortly before Uncle Sam doled out the cash. He also seemed quite confident that giving money to companies like Solyndra would create “millions of new, good paying jobs.”

On the day Solyndra got its $535 million from the government, Vice President Joe Biden appeared in a ceremony—via satellite from Washington D.C.—to announce that thousands of jobs would be created. “By investing in the infrastructure and technology of the future, we are not only creating jobs today, but laying the foundation for long-term growth in the 21st-century economy,” Biden proclaimed.

Try telling that to the 1,100 people who just got laid off with little notice, no severance pay or extended insurance benefits. Painful and devastating is how some described it in a local newspaper report as they hauled boxes containing personal belongings. Seeking an explanation from the Obama Administration, the paper published a quote from a low-level Department of Energy spokesman who handles public affairs.

Here it is: “We have always recognized that not every one of the innovative companies supported by our loans and loan guarantees would succeed. But we can’t stop investing in game-changing technologies that are key to America’s leadership in the global economy.”

 

September 2, 2011 Posted by | DumbAss Democrats, Obama Crap | Leave a comment

Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – Declaration of Independence II

Obama’s ineligibility: Prepare to defend America – Declaration of Independence II.

September 2, 2011 Posted by | Interesting to me, Obama Crap | Leave a comment

Eye-popper: Is Nancy Pelosi in on eligibility cover-up?

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=109363

August 31, 2011 Posted by | Obama Crap | Leave a comment

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=339629

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=339629

August 31, 2011 Posted by | Obama Crap | Leave a comment

Barack Obama and the CIA

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/gerald_warner/blog/2009/04/24/barack_obama_and_the_cia_why_does_president_pantywaist_hate_america_so_badly

May 26, 2009 Posted by | Obama Crap | | Leave a comment

We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2255411/posts

 

Posted on 2009-05-21 08:57:28 AM by Uncle Sham

We the People have a serious problem facing us. We have an out of control government hell-bent on further enslaving us at breakneck speed. This government displays a piece of paper every now and then called the Constitution, mostly at election time in an effort to comfort us into thinking that somehow it is being obeyed. We know differently, don’t we?

We have a person pretending to be President who has yet to prove to me or to anyone else for that matter that he is actually eligible to serve under the provisions of Article two of the Constitution. Our elected officials, as you will see below, are REQUIRED to ensure that he is in fact eligible. It is our job as citizens to put the heat on them (our elected officials) to do their primary job as defined in the Constituion, to “support it”. We have the legal case to do this and I’m going to post this so that EVERYONE who thinks we are powerless to do something about this understands how best to go about it. We need to find the legal remedy enabling us to charge our representatives with disobeying their oaths of office and start removing them one by one. Here is the case.

Exhibit A, The Twentieth Amendment, Section 3 reads as follows:

” ”3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President electshall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

Exhibit B U. S. Code, CITE: 3USC19

TITLE 3–THE PRESIDENT, CHAPTER 1- PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AND VACANCIES

Sec. 19. Vacancy in offices of both President and Vice President; officers eligible to act

”(a)(1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President. “

Exhibit C: U. S. Constitution, Article Six Oath of Office for elected officials:

” The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

Exhibit D: The Electoral Vote Counting Act of 1877:

The process currently provides that someone “challenge” the electoral votes during a short, specified time frame while the Electoral College votes are opened and tabulated. This process does not cover challenges to “eligibility” qualifications. In fact, if this act pretends to do so in the manner in which it prescribes, it is unconstitutional. Any act of this sort that does not require that qualifications be presented by the President elect serves to undercut the provisions in the Constitution itself. No act that does not support the Constitution is constitutional. In order to change the requirements of the Twentieth amendment, one would need to pass another amendment. An “Act” doesn’t cut the mustard.

The portion in bold stating “or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify” in section three is particularly interesting in that it plainly seems to infer that a “qualification” of some sort must be made in order to serve as President. Certainly, one cannot argue that it does not require a qualification process for one to “qualify”. To infer that the lack of a “specified” qualification process means that stated eligibility “qualifications” for the office of president can be ignored is fallacious. The wording of this passage in the twentieth amendment clearly infers that a qualification is required, regardless of how this is done.

There is only one set of qualifications listed anywhere in the Constitution that are not health related and they are listed in Article two, section one.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

To satisfy meeting the requirement of the twentieth amendment to “qualify”, a president elect must present evidence that he meets it’s requirements for eligibility to serve. This means that a proper birth certificate HAD to be presented by the president elect in order to serve as president. If this was done, where is that certificate and to whom was it presented? If this was done, why would we not have the right to verify and inspect it under the freedom of information act?

If it was NOT done, then under the provisions of the twentieth amendment, Barrack Obama has “failed to qualify” and should not be serving as president of the United States of America.

Based upon the above, I conclude that:

1. We currently have a vacancy at President because no one has yet “qualified” as required in the Twentieth amendment. The terms “The President elect shall have failed to qualify” clearly places this burden upon the President elect and not on someone raising their hand in objection.

2. Anyone serving in Congress (see “Congress” in bold in Exhibit A), or anyone who is currently serving under the oath of office in Article six has “standing” and can DEMAND that their oaths be met by receiving proper “qualifying” documentation from Mr. Obama. This charade at the time of counting the Electoral College votes does not limit their ability to do so at any time they so choose. The very fact that they are duty-bound by oath to “support” the Constitution REQUIRES them to respond to any and all attacks against it. No judge can deny any of them the standing to do so. It would ask them to break the law in their effort to enforce the law.

3. We need to start pressing legal charges against all of our local representatives and senators covered by the oath of office in Article six for disobeying their oaths to support the Constitution as it pertains to the language of section three of the Twentieth amendment. Put PRESSURE on them to represent the document that gives them their authority in the first place. We are looking into how best to do this down here. We all should be looking into this approach. NOW.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: birth; birthcertificate; certificate; certifigate; constitution; obama

We need to focus this thread on looking at all avenues of approach as it pertains to legally charging, convicting, and removing elected officials who refuse to obey their oath of office to the Constitution itself. What can they be charged with and how best should these charges be brought? If we did this nation-wide, it would have a larger impact than the Tea parties.
1 posted on 2009-05-21 08:57:28 AM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

Keep this train rolling! I’m sending this to my Senators and Rep. If they get enough of this they may actually “think” about doing something.

2 posted on 2009-05-21 09:12:48 AM by Don Corleone (“Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

They get by with this because they think that they have us in a position of fear. Also, if you look around the country, 50% of the fools out there think that this is cute. Most of them do not work nor do they file taxes. But they get to vote. Until such time as you all gather and confront these elected fools, let me highlight that—CONFRONT—. Until such time as they believe that they are going to be held individually accountable in some way that makes them fear for their being, this is going to continue.

I dont know what it is going to take, but there are enough devious and legal minds here that someone should be able to come up with something. These elected fools have to be made to respect the people. Right now they think that they are your owners and managers. They think that once they get elected it empowers them to control you. We have allowed that to happen. Just look at the damn-fool bills and laws that have been introduced lately. Also look at how they have been able with devious means to spike bills such as Texas’ sovereignty bill. Why? Because it would take them off the public tit……….wasnt that the intent in the first place?

Folks have to make a decision whether they are going to stand up or whether they will remain sheeple. It all begins with catching these politicians when they come home and scaring the fool out of them.

3 posted on 2009-05-21 09:16:04 AM by Concho ( No Birth Certificate-No Census!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

Good threat. Pinging for later when I can read ALL of it!!!!!

4 posted on 2009-05-21 09:48:57 AM by blueyon (It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

Fighting Communism all over the globe for most of the 20th century seems in retrospect like a wasted effort now we have a Communist usurper as President.

5 posted on 2009-05-21 01:09:02 PM by TexasRepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
“Keep this train rolling! I’m sending this to my Senators and Rep. If they get enough of this they may actually “think” about doing something.”Don’t count on them thinking, it’s legal pressure from us that we need to make them think about.
6 posted on 2009-05-21 07:18:50 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic
“Fighting Communism all over the globe for most of the 20th century seems in retrospect like a wasted effort now we have a Communist usurper as President.”That’s why it’s up to us, the plain ordinary folks who’ve made this country what we all should be trying like hell to preserve. All those young men and women who DIED to help us keep our freedom are counting on us to fight the fight. Pressing legal charges against cowardly representatives is one way to begin. We are looking into how to do so here in our area. Start a movement to do the same in your area. We can and WILL win this.

In the meantime, spread the word.

7 posted on 2009-05-21 07:23:57 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Jim, this is one thing we can ALL start doing. If there are legal types who have ideas about how best to approach this, it would be of great benefit to this effort.

8 posted on 2009-05-21 07:27:10 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
9 posted on 2009-05-21 07:29:28 PM by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob; ctdonath2; abb; STE=Q; frog in a pot; Atom Smasher; MHGinTN; rrstar96; …

a ping for your valued input.

Congressman Billybob, You expressed skepticism at whether or not one of our representatives would stand up for the Constitution on this issue. What can We the People do to such a coward, legally, because of this refusal?

10 posted on 2009-05-21 09:57:15 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

This is an excellent issue you have put together.

The first thing that needs to be done is to change the status quo. These idiots in the WH aren’t blind, they aren’t daft, they aren’t even stupid….they know exactly what they’re doing. They are stomping on the Constitution because they have the power to do it. They don’t care about values, principles, and the like. I’ll guarantee that half of them don’t even give a crapt about our country. All they care about is enriching themselves, and making sure they get voted back in. This comes from all the money, greed, and corruption that each of them has their fingers in. So, who in power is around to stop them?

Your read is excellent in that yes, everyone should keep sending this to officials that might change their minds & do something. Keep sending it over & over, like 3-4 times, if not more, a day. Right now might be the best time, because there are little divisions going on right now everywhere in the house, and in the same party.

Another thing, equally important, is to expose the corrupt corporations that are giving members in the WH their power. I’ve recently heard that the FBI is more than happy to go after subsidiaries of ACORN. (Just tonight it was said that Theresa Heinz Kerry has contributed over 8 million dollars to Tides…a subsidiary of ACORN). I think we are going to find that a lot of our politicians got their hands in this somewhere.

11 posted on 2009-05-21 10:21:31 PM by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: abb
Here’s some information concerning Oath Of Office Violations and the Consequences thereof.Oath of Office Law Information

From the Link:

Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “ advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”. The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine. Alright, this is a start.

12 posted on 2009-05-21 10:22:10 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

Continuing from my last post, I believe we can change the status quo in 2010. It’s obvious that even with legal help, the higher courts aren’t going for it. Changing the bodies, and then going after them is what I suggest. I just pray we can hold out that long.

Expose BillyBob for what he is. Expose all of them. We need to get the word out so the vote brings the change we need.

13 posted on 2009-05-21 10:29:35 PM by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Atom Smasher
Election time is far away. Proving that your local elected official has broken his Oath of office and taking him to court for it can be started as soon as you read the Constitution.Here’s the U.S. Constitution

The eligibility case I’ve outlined above will work. I’m quite sure that there are hundreds more to find and go after. Thanks for the help!

14 posted on 2009-05-21 10:56:56 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
Bookmarking and on guard.Us against them and all that jazz.

Its on, and the political class is facing a culling.

15 posted on 2009-05-21 10:58:56 PM by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

I suggest 2010 because I haven’t been able to find any attorneys here, in Michigan, who think my case is valid. I have quoted areas of the Constitution that we all know have been violated, but I’m told that it isn’t enough to prove wrong doing.

We have a gov here who is in bed with everyone, I even hear she might be looking to win the house next election. The WH @ssholes got their hands in our car companies here and God knows what else.

If you can find legal help in your state, please ping me & I will get a hold of your legal people, and ask them if they can recommend anyone to us here in Michigan. Surely these attorneys will know others like them.

Like I said, these were Const. Attorneys, or so they say. It was like I was talking to a wall. I even went as far as approaching a law professor at the University I attend, to see if they would consider taking this on….no go!

So let us all know what legal institution or firm you get in with, and maybe they can direct us in who to talk to in our states.

16 posted on 2009-05-21 11:48:26 PM by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Atom Smasher
It’s up to We the People. If we are unable to locate attorneys, we must press forward on our own. If we can kick start this legal storm it will turn into a whirlwind that will wipe the slate clean of EVERYONE in it’s path to restoring Constitutional law in this nation.The founding fathers put us in charge of our government. It’s time we stand up and claim ownership. Everyone reading this should be looking into all legal options for getting rid of their representatives who are OPENLY defying the Constitution. You can’t win a war with evil if you refuse to fight.
17 posted on 2009-05-22 08:20:20 AM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

“5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to **ADVOCATE** the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”(EMPHASES MINE)

The problem is that, at face, — unless we can prove otherwise — their culpability appears to be ‘tacit’ rather than ‘actively’ participating to overthrow or subvert the constitution.

It’s an ‘act’ of omission analogous to a policeman ‘looking the other way’ when a crime is being committed and, therefore, hard to prove.

In short: a ‘conspiracy’ of silence.

We need hard EVIDENCE from someone ‘high up’ who would be willing to ‘rat out’ the party or parties directly involved … EVIDENCE that would prove that government officials in Congress WILLFULLY — and ACTIVELY — violated their oaths of office.

There MUST be a ‘deep throat’, somewhere, willing to help.

Did somebody mention the FBI?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/31/AR2005053100655.html

STE=Q

18 posted on 2009-05-22 04:01:49 PM by STE=Q
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: STE=Q

I have an answer for you. It’s in the Constitution and I’ll post it a little later tonight. Read that document. We have multiple attack points from which to press legal cases.

19 posted on 2009-05-22 06:44:34 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
“It’s an ‘act’ of omission analogous to a policeman ‘looking the other way’ when a crime is being committed and, therefore, hard to prove.”This is not what we are facing here. What we are facing is telling a policeman, with a camera rolling as we do so, that his job is to prevent crime and in fact over there in that building we think we just saw a burglar entering the back window of the bank, then he ignores us.

I’m working on another angle of attack as well as this one, all from a Constitutional perspective. Stay tuned.

20 posted on 2009-05-23 12:00:51 AM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
I have an answer for you. It’s in the Constitution and I’ll post it a little later tonight. Read that document.I will!

Thanks for your reply.

STE=Q

21 posted on 2009-05-23 10:07:44 AM by STE=Q
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Atom Smasher
“So let us all know what legal institution or firm you get in with, and maybe they can direct us in who to talk to in our states.”Find conservative judges and conservative Federal prosecutors and present this to them. I’m not getting the responses you seem to be getting. I’m trying to find out what all of the options are for REMOVING my representatives from office.
22 posted on 2009-05-23 01:30:52 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

Thank you very much for that. I’ll keep looking.

23 posted on 2009-05-23 02:54:30 PM by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: STE=Q
“The problem is that, at face, — unless we can prove otherwise — their culpability appears to be ‘tacit’ rather than ‘actively’ participating to overthrow or subvert the constitution.”“In short: a ‘conspiracy’ of silence.”

Ignoring any portion of the Constitution is equivalent to ignoring all of it. It is not now, nor ever has been a “pick and choose” document. The document itself in Article Six says:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

Another passage from Article Four, Section four says:

“Section 4 – Republican government The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”

Now, what does this passage mean to you? To me it means that we as a nation are a “representative republic” whereby our wishes and demands are represented by someone who “represents” them on our behalf. This passage “guarantees” to every state that we will be “represented”. Think about this guarantee for a moment. Are we being represented, if our legislator is absent during votes? Are we being represented if our legislator doesn’t know the content of that which he cast votes for or against? What’s the difference? This goes beyond just the oath of office because now this “guarantee” is also being compromised.

24 posted on 2009-05-23 04:12:15 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
“Section 4 – Republican government — The United States shall GUARANTEE to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.” (Emphases Mine)Believe it or not, I took your advice and Article Four, Section Four, jumped out at me!

… And I did a little research, as follows:

Republic (n)

1: a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and is usually a president; also: a nation or other political unit having such a government

2: a government in which supreme power is held by the citizens entitled to VOTE and is exercised by elected officers and representatives governing according to LAW; also: a nation or other political unit having such a form of government(Emphases Mine)

Notice #2: The SUPREME POWER of ‘The Citizens’ is transfered by the agency of the citizens VOTE to Officers and REPRESENTATIVES who then become empowered to govern — on behalf of the citizens — according to LAW.

Now once we EMPOWER the aforementioned REPRESENTATIVES to govern on our behalf, through the agency of our VOTE; the most obvious way to dis-empower them, is ALSO, though the agency of our vote.

I also found this little “gem” as follows:

GUARANTEE OF REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT

The first clause of this section, in somewhat different language, was contained in the Virginia Plan introduced in the Convention and was obviously attributable to Madison. 321 Through the various permutations into its final form, 322 the object of the clause seems clearly to have been more than an authorization for the Federal Government to protect States against foreign invasion or internal insurrection, 323 a power seemingly already conferred in any case. 324 No one can now resurrect the full meaning of the clause and intent which moved the Framers to adopt it, but with the exception of the reliance for a brief period during Reconstruction the authority contained within the confines of the clause has been largely unexplored. 325

In Luther v. Borden, 326 the Supreme Court established the doctrine that questions arising under this section are political, not judicial, in character and that “it rests with Congress to decide what government is the established one in a State . . . as well as its republican character…”

So — according to the Supreme Court — CONGRESS must GUARANTEE: A Republican form of Government.

The KEY word here is GUARANTEE.

So my question is this:

What LAWS have Congress passed in order to “guarantee” a Republican Form of Government?

Who will oversee this “GUARANTEE” if the Supreme Court won’t!

THE AMERICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT (copy and past)

Excerpt:

When Ben Franklin exited the constitutional convention he was asked by a woman:

‘Sir, what have you given us?’

He replied ‘A Republic Ma am, if you can keep it’

Apparently, the burden is on “We the People” to restore the republic, before it’s too late!

We must keep the issue of Obama’s hiding his citizenship status — in plain sight of The United States Congress — alive!

STE=Q

25 posted on 2009-05-23 10:45:48 PM by STE=Q
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: STE=Q
“Now once we EMPOWER the aforementioned REPRESENTATIVES to govern on our behalf, through the agency of our VOTE; the most obvious way to dis-empower them, is ALSO, though the agency of our vote.”Our “vote” cannot be the only way because if they want to ignore the Constitution, whats to keep them from simply ignoring the parts of it that require elections? We MUST and investigate and define all avenues of removal of our “public servants”. Good digging, though.
26 posted on 2009-05-23 11:16:47 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

BUMP!

27 posted on 2009-05-25 08:05:53 AM by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It’s The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Thanks for the bump. This issue deserves it.

28 posted on 2009-05-25 03:09:58 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham; Fred Nerks; ETL; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; stockpirate; …
We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected OfficialsPinging The List.
29 posted on 2009-05-25 03:19:33 PM by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

From the very beginning of obama’s refusal to show his BC, I mentioned a class action lawsuit. For some reason I was told it was not possible. Say 5 million people, getting together and paying a dollar each for a attorney to do one thing, get the BC. What attorney would say no to that?

what are the legal terms of a class action lawsuit? We have enough people online to do this. Look at the tea party participant numbers.

30 posted on 2009-05-25 03:26:03 PM by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atom Smasher

There are attorneys and groups who fight for the people. I know there is a big one in Washington.

http://www.citizen.org/litigation/forms/cases/casesbytopic_Date.cfm

One of the lawsuits filed was over Franklin Raines and line item veto. What? Imagine that. I have read one of the cases the attorneys fought and won. His name was Greg Beck but he does cases about online fair use laws. From my reading they seem totally involved in citizens rights as according to the laws.

http://www.tlpj.org/ I know nothing about this one.

There is another one that I can’t remember the name of. They fought for all of those college students who got stung uploading songs.

Why would these non profits not look into this? The other problem is someone has to have asked already.

31 posted on 2009-05-25 03:50:25 PM by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: STE=Q

“5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C.

Anyone have the Pelosi signed document she vetted obama properly?

32 posted on 2009-05-25 03:53:04 PM by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice

I don’t think we need a class-action lawsuit because those representatives of ours have the “standing” by virtue of their oath of office in Article Six of the Constitution. It is up to us, the little folks to put LEGAL pressure on each of our representatives to live up to their oath of office or just admit that the Constitution is worthless. Guess what. If it’s worthless, they can no longer claim powers granted to them by it. We don’t have to respect it either. Let’s put them in that corner.

33 posted on 2009-05-25 04:12:51 PM by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Mike Gallagher had a program today on the ‘missing BC’.

34 posted on 2009-05-25 04:28:20 PM by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

Haven’t we tried to do that? Look at all the money spent for full page ads and the lawsuits. What the h*ll is going on? I am beginning to think this was one big conspiracy to turn our nation into socialism and our GOP are a part of it.

After Orly confronted two SCOTUS judges did they ever answer her?

Update me what you figure out. Cheney is on the lawsuit to answer June 21st.

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/category/lawyers/mario-apuzzo/

I think a lot has been done to corner everyone unless they dumb, deaf and blind.

35 posted on 2009-05-25 05:11:07 PM by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham

http://www.aunetwork.tv/

this website has weekly teleconference on obama’s eligibility. You can call in and ask questions or give your ideas. They all work together once they have a plan too. The past calls are available.

36 posted on 2009-05-25 05:13:48 PM by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sham
…his job is to prevent crime and in fact over there in that building we think we just saw…”And therein lies the problem in a huge nutshell. His job is NOT to prevent crime. His job is to investigate the crime afterwards, and prosecute the criminal(s) if there is enough proof a criminal can/will be found guilty. I THINK doesn’t get it. A PROVEN, ACTUAL crime has got to be committed first or a policeman cannot act, and it must be pursued as a crime by criminal investigation. There must be independent PROOF that a criminal is guilty because a criminal cannot be forced to incriminate him/herself.
As I said before, the Fifth Amendment has created a paradox in this situation. I don’t have time right now to go into this deeper, but I will later.
37 posted on 2009-05-25 06:28:08 PM by MestaMachine (Will global warming make hell hotter? Or is hell freezing over? That is the ???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

 

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

May 26, 2009 Posted by | Obama Crap | | Leave a comment

Revealed: The Obama birth certificate protection act

http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/2257619/posts

May 26, 2009 Posted by | Obama Crap | | Leave a comment