Comments for Not1b4me's Blog http://not1b4me.wordpress.com WeRtheVoices Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:32:53 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on ClimateGate: The Fix is In by hkyson http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/11/24/climategate-the-fix-is-in/#comment-142 hkyson Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:32:53 +0000 http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/?p=742#comment-142 “Climategate” started out when there appeared on the Internet a collection of e-mails of a group of climatologists who work in the University of East Anglia in England. These documents reveal that some climatologists of international preeminence have manipulated the data of their investigations and have strongly tried to discredit climatologists who are not convinced that the increasing quantities of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere are the cause of global warming. It is true that a majority of the scientists who study climatic tendencies in our atmosphere have arrived at the conclusion that the world’s climate is changing, and they have convinced a group of politicians, some of whom are politically powerful, of the truth of their conclusions. A minority, however, is skeptical. Some believe that recent data that suggest that the average temperature of the atmosphere is going up can be explained by natural variations in solar radiation and that global warming is a temporary phenomenon. Others believe that the historical evidence indicating that the temperature of the atmosphere is going up at a dangerous rate is simply not reliable. Such lacks of agreement are common in the sciences. They are reduced and eventually eliminated with the accumulation of new evidence and of more refined theories or even by completely new ones. Such debates can persist for a period of decades. Academics often throw invective at one another in these debates. But typically this does not mean much. But the case of climate change is different. If the evidence indicates that global warming is progressive, is caused principally by our industrial processes, and will probably cause disastrous changes in our atmosphere before the end of the twenty-first century, then we do not have the time to verify precisely if this evidence is reliable. Such a process would be a question of many years of new investigations. And if the alarmist climatologists are right, such a delay would be tragic for all humanity. The difficulty is that economic and climatologic systems are very complicated. They are not like celestial mechanics, which involves only the interaction of gravity and centrifugal force, and efforts to construct computerized models to describe these complicated systems simply cannot include all the factors that are influential in the evolution of these complicated systems. All this does not necessarily indicate that the alarmist climatologists are not right. But it really means that if global warming is occurring, we cannot know exactly what will be the average temperature of our atmosphere in the year 2100 and what will be the average sea level of the world’s ocean in that year. It also means that we cannot be confident that efforts by the industrialized countries to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere will have a significant influence on the evolution of the world’s climate. Alas, the reduction of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere would be very costly and would greatly change the lives of all the inhabitants of our planet--with the possibility (perhaps even the probability!) that all these efforts will be completely useless. Harleigh Kyson Jr. “Climategate” started out when there appeared on the Internet a collection of e-mails of a group of climatologists who work in the University of East Anglia in England. These documents reveal that some climatologists of international preeminence have manipulated the data of their investigations and have strongly tried to discredit climatologists who are not convinced that the increasing quantities of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere are the cause of global warming.

It is true that a majority of the scientists who study climatic tendencies in our atmosphere have arrived at the conclusion that the world’s climate is changing, and they have convinced a group of politicians, some of whom are politically powerful, of the truth of their conclusions.

A minority, however, is skeptical. Some believe that recent data that suggest that the average temperature of the atmosphere is going up can be explained by natural variations in solar radiation and that global warming is a temporary phenomenon. Others believe that the historical evidence indicating that the temperature of the atmosphere is going up at a dangerous rate is simply not reliable.

Such lacks of agreement are common in the sciences. They are reduced and eventually eliminated with the accumulation of new evidence and of more refined theories or even by completely new ones. Such debates can persist for a period of decades. Academics often throw invective at one another in these debates. But typically this does not mean much.

But the case of climate change is different. If the evidence indicates that global warming is progressive, is caused principally by our industrial processes, and will probably cause disastrous changes in our atmosphere before the end of the twenty-first century, then we do not have the time to verify precisely if this evidence is reliable. Such a process would be a question of many years of new investigations. And if the alarmist climatologists are right, such a delay would be tragic for all humanity.

The difficulty is that economic and climatologic systems are very complicated. They are not like celestial mechanics, which involves only the interaction of gravity and centrifugal force, and efforts to construct computerized models to describe these complicated systems simply cannot include all the factors that are influential in the evolution of these complicated systems.

All this does not necessarily indicate that the alarmist climatologists are not right. But it really means that if global warming is occurring, we cannot know exactly what will be the average temperature of our atmosphere in the year 2100 and what will be the average sea level of the world’s ocean in that year.

It also means that we cannot be confident that efforts by the industrialized countries to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere will have a significant influence on the evolution of the world’s climate.

Alas, the reduction of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere would be very costly and would greatly change the lives of all the inhabitants of our planet–with the possibility (perhaps even the probability!) that all these efforts will be completely useless.

Harleigh Kyson Jr.

]]> Comment on PLEASE READ THIS ALL THE WAY TO THE BOTTOM. by Lupe Weaver http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/06/15/please-read-this-all-the-way-to-the-bottom/#comment-134 Lupe Weaver Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:08:34 +0000 http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/?p=723#comment-134 I really don't care who wrote this article. What matters is the content. It is very scary to know that our country is being subotaged by people that hate the USA and nothing is being done to fight back. I love my country and where is it going to end. GOD bless America!!! I really don’t care who wrote this article. What matters is the content. It is very scary to know that our country is being subotaged by people that hate the USA and nothing is being done to fight back. I love my country and where is it going to end. GOD bless America!!!

]]> Comment on Immigration and Welfare by TL Winslow http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/immigration-and-welfare/#comment-133 TL Winslow Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:18:59 +0000 http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/immigration-and-welfare/#comment-133 The age-old pesky U.S.-Mexico border problem has taxed the resources of both countries, led to long lists of injustices, and appears to be heading only for worse troubles in the future. Guess what? The border problem can never be solved. Why? Because the border IS the problem! It's time for a paradigm change. Never fear, a satisfying, comprehensive solution is within reach: the Megamerge Dissolution Solution. Simply dissolve the border along with the failed Mexican government, and megamerge the two countries under U.S. law, with mass free 2-way migration eventually equalizing the development and opportunities permanently, with justice and without racism, and without threatening U.S. sovereignty or basic principles. Click the url and read about the new paradigm for U.S.-Mexico relations. The age-old pesky U.S.-Mexico border problem has taxed the resources of both countries, led to long lists of injustices, and appears to be heading only for worse troubles in the future. Guess what? The border problem can never be solved. Why? Because the border IS the problem! It’s time for a paradigm change.

Never fear, a satisfying, comprehensive solution is within reach: the Megamerge Dissolution Solution. Simply dissolve the border along with the failed Mexican government, and megamerge the two countries under U.S. law, with mass free 2-way migration eventually equalizing the development and opportunities permanently, with justice and without racism, and without threatening U.S. sovereignty or basic principles.

Click the url and read about the new paradigm for U.S.-Mexico relations.

]]> Comment on Go 48 years without releasing any documents and you too can be President! by primo http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/03/18/go-48-years-without-releasing-any-documents-and-you-too-can-be-president/#comment-131 primo Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:13:35 +0000 http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/?p=536#comment-131 Mr. Berg, Your foolish websites, blogs, lawsuits, etc. about the issue of the President’s citizenship is nothing more than a thin veil to make a mockery on the citizen of the Untied States. Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:” • Anyone born inside the United States * • Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe • Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S. • Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national • Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year • Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21 • Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time) • A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S. * There is an exception in the law – the person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision. Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. Separate sections handle territories that the United States has acquired over time, such as Puerto Rico (8 USC 1402), Alaska (8 USC 1404), Hawaii (8 USC 1405), the U.S. Virgin Islands (8 USC 1406), and Guam (8 USC 1407). Each of these sections confer citizenship on persons living in these territories as of a certain date, and usually confer natural-born status on persons born in those territories after that date. For example, for Puerto Rico, all persons born in Puerto Rico between April 11, 1899, and January 12, 1941, are automatically conferred citizenship as of the date the law was signed by the President (June 27, 1952). Additionally, all persons born in Puerto Rico on or after January 13, 1941, are natural-born citizens of the United States. Note that because of when the law was passed, for some, the natural-born status was retroactive. Perhaps, you should post this good law and statutory language on your website so that the people will grasp a clear understanding about what the law says about what constitutes “citizens of the United States at birth”. But, as expected, you won’t even bother post this law on your websites, blogs or elsewhere, because you know your position regarding the Constitution is patently frivolous; indeed, a fact found by all Courts you have filed papers with. Indeed, here is an exceprt from Title 8: TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part I > § 1401Prev | Next § 1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth How Current is This? The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: (a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; (b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property; (c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person; (d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States; (e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person; (f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States; (g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and (h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States. Mr. Berg,
Your foolish websites, blogs, lawsuits, etc. about the issue of the President’s citizenship is nothing more than a thin veil to make a mockery on the citizen of the Untied States.
Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code Section 1401 defines the following as people who are “citizens of the United States at birth:”
• Anyone born inside the United States *
• Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
• Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
• Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
• Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
• Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
• Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
• A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
* There is an exception in the law – the person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. Separate sections handle territories that the United States has acquired over time, such as Puerto Rico (8 USC 1402), Alaska (8 USC 1404), Hawaii (8 USC 1405), the U.S. Virgin Islands (8 USC 1406), and Guam (8 USC 1407). Each of these sections confer citizenship on persons living in these territories as of a certain date, and usually confer natural-born status on persons born in those territories after that date. For example, for Puerto Rico, all persons born in Puerto Rico between April 11, 1899, and January 12, 1941, are automatically conferred citizenship as of the date the law was signed by the President (June 27, 1952). Additionally, all persons born in Puerto Rico on or after January 13, 1941, are natural-born citizens of the United States. Note that because of when the law was passed, for some, the natural-born status was retroactive.
Perhaps, you should post this good law and statutory language on your website so that the people will grasp a clear understanding about what the law says about what constitutes “citizens of the United States at birth”. But, as expected, you won’t even bother post this law on your websites, blogs or elsewhere, because you know your position regarding the Constitution is patently frivolous; indeed, a fact found by all Courts you have filed papers with.

Indeed, here is an exceprt from Title 8:

TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER III > Part I > § 1401Prev | Next § 1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth
How Current is This? The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.

]]> Comment on What the Founders Said About Slavery by We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/what-the-founders-said-about-slavery/#comment-126 We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog Tue, 26 May 2009 01:19:14 +0000 http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-126 [...] Gallagher had a program today on the ‘missing BC’. 34 posted on 2009-05-25 04:28:20 PM by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be [...] [...] Gallagher had a program today on the ‘missing BC’. 34 posted on 2009-05-25 04:28:20 PM by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be [...]

]]> Comment on Those Who Would Repeal That Right by We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/those-who-would-repeal-that-right/#comment-123 We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog Tue, 26 May 2009 01:18:56 +0000 http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-123 [...] would these non profits not look into this? The other problem is someone has to have asked already. 31 posted on 2009-05-25 03:50:25 PM by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to [...] [...] would these non profits not look into this? The other problem is someone has to have asked already. 31 posted on 2009-05-25 03:50:25 PM by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to [...]

]]> Comment on What the Framers said about our Second Amendment Rights to Keep and Bear Arms by We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/what-the-framers-said-about-our-second-amendment-rights-to-keep-and-bear-arms/#comment-119 We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog Tue, 26 May 2009 01:18:36 +0000 http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-119 [...] 27 posted on 2009-05-25 08:05:53 AM by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It’s The Only Planet [...] [...] 27 posted on 2009-05-25 08:05:53 AM by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It’s The Only Planet [...]

]]> Comment on They Were Not Alone. More Quotes by We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/they-were-not-alone-more-quotes/#comment-117 We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog Tue, 26 May 2009 01:18:25 +0000 http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-117 [...] 25 posted on 2009-05-23 10:45:48 PM by STE=Q [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies] To: [...] [...] 25 posted on 2009-05-23 10:45:48 PM by STE=Q [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies] To: [...]

]]> Comment on Government Quotes by We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/constitutional-limitations-on-government/#comment-111 We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog Tue, 26 May 2009 01:17:48 +0000 http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-111 [...] 18 posted on 2009-05-22 04:01:49 PM by STE=Q [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies] To: [...] [...] 18 posted on 2009-05-22 04:01:49 PM by STE=Q [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies] To: [...]

]]> Comment on The Bush Administration Lied About WMD by We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/2009/02/13/the-bush-administration-lied-about-wmd/#comment-105 We The People Versus Our Lawless Elected Officials « Not1b4me’s Blog Tue, 26 May 2009 01:17:09 +0000 http://not1b4me.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-105 [...] I think we are going to find that a lot of our politicians got their hands in this somewhere. 11 posted on 2009-05-21 10:21:31 PM by Atom Smasher [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View [...] [...] I think we are going to find that a lot of our politicians got their hands in this somewhere. 11 posted on 2009-05-21 10:21:31 PM by Atom Smasher [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View [...]

]]>